Quick check-ins for athletes.Clear reports for your staff.
Athletes share how they feel before immersion, immediately after, and the next morning. They also tell you whether they would choose NANO Immersion again. NANO Connect organizes their feedback into daily, weekly, and final evaluation reports delivered to your staff by email.
Personalized for your program. Built around your evaluation.
ATHLETES CHECK INExample
NANO Connect
How do you feel?
Muscle soreness5 / 10
BeforeAfterNext morning
STAFF RECEIVE REPORTSBy email
NANO Connect
Your program. Your athletes’ feedback.
A summary to read. A full report to explore.
DailyWeeklyFinal evaluation
Illustrative example — fictional dataTo protect the privacy of our customers and their athletes, this public preview uses fictional records and example reports.
01 · For athletes
A quick check-in. Then back to your day.
Open your team’s link, enter your Athlete ID, and share how you feel. Short check-ins capture your experience before immersion, immediately after, and the next morning.
Scan once to get started.
Use your team’s QR code to open NANO Connect. Add it to your home screen for easy access.
Your next-morning reminder comes to you.
With notifications enabled, you’ll receive a reminder the next morning. Tap it to open your questions and complete your check-in in 15 seconds or less.
Before immersion15 seconds or less
How do you feel going in?
Immediately after15 seconds or less
How do you feel, and would you choose NANO Immersion again?
The next morning15 seconds or less
How did you sleep, and how do you feel today?
The athlete’s experience stays at the center of the evaluation, from the first check-in through the next morning.
NANO ConnectExample
Personalized for Your Program
Before immersion
Athlete ID A001Post-training
Muscle soreness5 / 10
0 · No soreness10 · Extreme soreness
Heavy legs4 / 10
0 · Not heavy10 · Very heavy
Overall fatigue6 / 10
0 · No fatigue10 · Extreme fatigue
Readiness5 / 10
0 · Not ready10 · Fully ready
Example responses · No information is submitted
Selected questions from an example check-in. Fictional responses are shown to illustrate the experience.
Immediately-after example
NANO ConnectExample
Personalized for Your Program
Immediately after
Athlete ID A001Post-training
Muscle soreness4 / 10
0 · No soreness10 · Extreme soreness
Heavy legs3 / 10
0 · Not heavy10 · Very heavy
Overall fatigue4 / 10
0 · No fatigue10 · Extreme fatigue
Readiness6 / 10
0 · Not ready10 · Fully ready
Compared with before, how do you feel?Slightly better
Would you choose NANO Immersion again?Yes
Example responses · No information is submitted
Next-morning example
NANO ConnectExample
Personalized for Your Program
The next morning
Athlete ID A001Post-training
Sleep quality8 / 10
0 · Very poor10 · Excellent
Muscle soreness3 / 10
0 · No soreness10 · Extreme soreness
Heavy legs3 / 10
0 · Not heavy10 · Very heavy
Overall fatigue4 / 10
0 · No fatigue10 · Extreme fatigue
Readiness7 / 10
0 · Not ready10 · Fully ready
Compared with a usual morning after similar activitySlightly better than normal
Example responses · No information is submitted
02 · For staff
Your reports come to you.
Read the email summary. Open the full report when you want the details.
Daily reports
See participation, athlete feedback, and which check-ins need follow-up.
Weekly reports
Review the week’s athlete feedback in one report.
Final evaluation report
Bring all collected feedback together to help your staff decide what comes next.
From: NANO Connect Reports To: Your Program performance staff
NANO Connect
Your Program
Daily report
Sessions on September 7, 2026 Includes follow-up received through September 8.
Illustrative example — fictional data
2 example athletes contributed 2 sessions. 2 sessions include before-and-after responses; 2 include a next-morning check-in.
Sessions with all three check-ins2 of 2Before + after + next morning
Reported feeling better after2 of 2Sessions with before-and-after responses
2 of 2 responses: would choose NANO Immersion again.
2 of 2 next-morning responses: felt better than usual.
Read the summary here. Open the report for participation, feedback, and follow-up details.
Explore the daily, weekly, and final reports. Every view uses the same fictional evaluation records.
Daily example report
Full example report · Fictional data
NANO Connect Staff report Daily report Sessions on September 7, 2026 Includes follow-up received through September 8.
Illustrative example — fictional data
Your Program NANO Immersion Evaluation
2 example athletes contributed 2 sessions. 2 sessions include before-and-after responses; 2 include a next-morning check-in.
2Example athletes
2Evaluated sessions
2 of 2Reported feeling better immediately afterSession responses
2 of 2Would choose NANO Immersion againSession responses
Feedback counts are per session. An athlete may contribute more than one session. Missing responses are excluded from feedback totals and shown separately below.
Participation & completion
Before-and-after responses2 of 2
Next-morning responses2 of 2
Sessions with all three check-ins2 of 2
Missing immediately after0
Missing next morning0
Immediately-after experience
Felt better2 of 2
No change0 of 2
Felt worse0 of 2
Reported concerns for review0
Would choose NANO Immersion again
Yes2 of 2
Not sure0 of 2
No0 of 2
2 session responses to this question.
The next morning
Compared with a usual morning after similar activity.
Felt better than usual2 of 2
About the same0 of 2
Felt worse than usual0 of 2
Average sleep quality8.0 / 10
Sleep quality: 2 responses on a 0–10 scale, from very poor to excellent.
Before-and-after scores
Reported measure
Before
After
Change
Muscle soreness
4.0
3.0
1.0 points lower
Heavy legs
4.0
3.0
1.0 points lower
Overall fatigue
5.0
3.5
1.5 points lower
Readiness
5.5
6.5
1.0 points higher
Average scores from 2 sessions with both responses. Scores run from 0 to 10. Lower means less reported soreness, heavy legs, or fatigue; higher means greater reported readiness. Changes use unrounded averages.
Session context
Post-training2 sessions
Fictional demonstration data. These records illustrate how NANO Connect organizes an evaluation. They are not customer results or a prediction of outcomes. Every figure comes from the same example records used throughout this preview. Athlete-reported feedback supports staff review; it does not establish treatment effects or readiness to play.
Weekly example report
Review the week’s athlete feedback together in one report.
From: NANO Connect Reports To: Your Program performance staff
NANO Connect
Your Program
Weekly report
Sessions: September 7–13, 2026 Responses received through September 13.
Illustrative example — fictional data
6 example athletes contributed 6 sessions. 5 sessions include before-and-after responses; 4 include a next-morning check-in.
Sessions with all three check-ins4 of 6Before + after + next morning
Reported feeling better after4 of 5Sessions with before-and-after responses
5 of 5 responses: would choose NANO Immersion again.
3 of 4 next-morning responses: felt better than usual.
Read the summary here. Open the report for participation, feedback, and follow-up details.
View the full weekly report
NANO Connect Staff report Weekly report Sessions: September 7–13, 2026 Responses received through September 13.
Illustrative example — fictional data
Your Program NANO Immersion Evaluation
6 example athletes contributed 6 sessions. 5 sessions include before-and-after responses; 4 include a next-morning check-in.
6Example athletes
6Evaluated sessions
4 of 5Reported feeling better immediately afterSession responses
5 of 5Would choose NANO Immersion againSession responses
Feedback counts are per session. An athlete may contribute more than one session. Missing responses are excluded from feedback totals and shown separately below.
Participation & completion
Before-and-after responses5 of 6
Next-morning responses4 of 6
Sessions with all three check-ins4 of 6
Missing immediately after1
Missing next morning2
Immediately-after experience
Felt better4 of 5
No change1 of 5
Felt worse0 of 5
Reported concerns for review0
Would choose NANO Immersion again
Yes5 of 5
Not sure0 of 5
No0 of 5
5 session responses to this question.
The next morning
Compared with a usual morning after similar activity.
Felt better than usual3 of 4
About the same1 of 4
Felt worse than usual0 of 4
Average sleep quality7.8 / 10
Sleep quality: 4 responses on a 0–10 scale, from very poor to excellent.
Before-and-after scores
Reported measure
Before
After
Change
Muscle soreness
4.6
3.6
1.0 points lower
Heavy legs
4.6
3.8
0.8 points lower
Overall fatigue
5.0
3.8
1.2 points lower
Readiness
5.0
6.0
1.0 points higher
Average scores from 5 sessions with both responses. Scores run from 0 to 10. Lower means less reported soreness, heavy legs, or fatigue; higher means greater reported readiness. Changes use unrounded averages.
Session context
Post-training3 sessions
Recovery day1 session
Post-match2 sessions
Fictional demonstration data. These records illustrate how NANO Connect organizes an evaluation. They are not customer results or a prediction of outcomes. Every figure comes from the same example records used throughout this preview. Athlete-reported feedback supports staff review; it does not establish treatment effects or readiness to play.
Final evaluation example report
Review the complete evaluation record, including participation, responses, and missing check-ins.
From: NANO Connect Reports To: Your Program performance staff
NANO Connect
Your Program
Final evaluation report
Evaluation: September 7–20, 2026 Responses received through September 20.
Illustrative example — fictional data
6 example athletes contributed 12 sessions. 10 sessions include before-and-after responses; 8 include a next-morning check-in.
Sessions with all three check-ins8 of 12Before + after + next morning
Reported feeling better after8 of 10Sessions with before-and-after responses
9 of 10 responses: would choose NANO Immersion again.
6 of 8 next-morning responses: felt better than usual.
Read the summary here. Open the report for participation, feedback, and follow-up details.
View the full final evaluation report
NANO Connect Staff report Final evaluation report Evaluation: September 7–20, 2026 Responses received through September 20.
Illustrative example — fictional data
Your Program NANO Immersion Evaluation
6 example athletes contributed 12 sessions. 10 sessions include before-and-after responses; 8 include a next-morning check-in.
6Example athletes
12Evaluated sessions
8 of 10Reported feeling better immediately afterSession responses
9 of 10Would choose NANO Immersion againSession responses
Feedback counts are per session. An athlete may contribute more than one session. Missing responses are excluded from feedback totals and shown separately below.
Participation & completion
Before-and-after responses10 of 12
Next-morning responses8 of 12
Sessions with all three check-ins8 of 12
Missing immediately after2
Missing next morning4
Immediately-after experience
Felt better8 of 10
No change2 of 10
Felt worse0 of 10
Reported concerns for review0
Would choose NANO Immersion again
Yes9 of 10
Not sure1 of 10
No0 of 10
10 session responses to this question.
The next morning
Compared with a usual morning after similar activity.
Felt better than usual6 of 8
About the same2 of 8
Felt worse than usual0 of 8
Average sleep quality7.6 / 10
Sleep quality: 8 responses on a 0–10 scale, from very poor to excellent.
Before-and-after scores
Reported measure
Before
After
Change
Muscle soreness
4.4
3.4
1.0 points lower
Heavy legs
4.4
3.6
0.8 points lower
Overall fatigue
4.8
3.7
1.1 points lower
Readiness
5.1
6.1
1.0 points higher
Average scores from 10 sessions with both responses. Scores run from 0 to 10. Lower means less reported soreness, heavy legs, or fatigue; higher means greater reported readiness. Changes use unrounded averages.
Session context
Post-training7 sessions
Recovery day3 sessions
Post-match2 sessions
Fictional demonstration data. These records illustrate how NANO Connect organizes an evaluation. They are not customer results or a prediction of outcomes. Every figure comes from the same example records used throughout this preview. Athlete-reported feedback supports staff review; it does not establish treatment effects or readiness to play.
03 · Your evaluation
See the experience behind the summary.
Follow participation across your program, review athlete responses, and see where feedback is still missing. Your staff can explore the details that matter to their evaluation.
NANO Connect
Full evaluation overview · All example sessions
Illustrative example — fictional data
Athletes6Fictional athlete IDs
Sessions12Across the full example evaluation
Before & after10 of 12Both check-ins received
Next morning8 of 12Follow-up received
Would choose NANO Immersion again
9 of 10
Session responses: Yes. 1 not sure · 0 no
Felt better than usual the next morning
6 of 8
Next-morning session responses. Compared with a usual morning after similar activity. 2 about the same · 0 worse
How athletes felt immediately after
Felt better8 of 10
No change2 of 10
Felt worse0 of 10
Based on 10 sessions with before-and-after check-ins. An athlete may contribute more than one session.
What needs follow-up
Missing immediately after2
Missing next morning4
Reported concerns for review0
Missing counts refer to check-ins. One session may be missing more than one check-in.
Explore individual athlete responses
Example athlete: A001
Sep 7, 2026 · Post-trainingSlightly better
3 of 3 check-ins received Complete
Reported measure
Before
After
Morning
Muscle soreness
5
4
3
Heavy legs
4
3
3
Overall fatigue
6
4
4
Readiness
5
6
7
Sleep quality: 8/10 · Next morning: slightly better than normal
Would choose NANO Immersion again: Yes
Sep 14, 2026 · Post-trainingSlightly better
3 of 3 check-ins received Complete
Reported measure
Before
After
Morning
Muscle soreness
4
3
3
Heavy legs
4
3
3
Overall fatigue
5
4
4
Readiness
5
6
6
Sleep quality: 8/10 · Next morning: slightly better than normal
Would choose NANO Immersion again: Yes
Example athlete: A002
Sep 7, 2026 · Post-trainingSlightly better
3 of 3 check-ins received Complete
Reported measure
Before
After
Morning
Muscle soreness
3
2
2
Heavy legs
4
3
2
Overall fatigue
4
3
3
Readiness
6
7
7
Sleep quality: 8/10 · Next morning: slightly better than normal
Would choose NANO Immersion again: Yes
Sep 16, 2026 · Recovery dayNo change
3 of 3 check-ins received Complete
Reported measure
Before
After
Morning
Muscle soreness
3
3
3
Heavy legs
3
3
3
Overall fatigue
4
4
4
Readiness
6
6
6
Sleep quality: 7/10 · Next morning: about the same
Would choose NANO Immersion again: Not sure
Example athlete: A003
Sep 9, 2026 · Post-trainingSlightly better
2 of 3 check-ins received Follow-up outstanding
Reported measure
Before
After
Morning
Muscle soreness
6
5
—
Heavy legs
5
5
—
Overall fatigue
6
5
—
Readiness
4
5
—
Next-morning check-in not received.
Would choose NANO Immersion again: Yes
Sep 14, 2026 · Post-trainingSlightly better
3 of 3 check-ins received Complete
Reported measure
Before
After
Morning
Muscle soreness
6
5
4
Heavy legs
6
5
4
Overall fatigue
5
4
4
Readiness
4
5
6
Sleep quality: 7/10 · Next morning: slightly better than normal
Would choose NANO Immersion again: Yes
Example athlete: A004
Sep 9, 2026 · Recovery dayImmediately-after response not received
1 of 3 check-ins received Follow-up outstanding
Reported measure
Before
After
Morning
Muscle soreness
4
—
—
Heavy legs
3
—
—
Overall fatigue
5
—
—
Readiness
5
—
—
Next-morning check-in not received.
Sep 18, 2026 · Post-trainingClearly better
3 of 3 check-ins received Complete
Reported measure
Before
After
Morning
Muscle soreness
5
3
3
Heavy legs
4
3
2
Overall fatigue
5
3
3
Readiness
5
7
7
Sleep quality: 8/10 · Next morning: clearly better than normal
Would choose NANO Immersion again: Yes
Example athlete: A005
Sep 11, 2026 · Post-matchClearly better
3 of 3 check-ins received Complete
Reported measure
Before
After
Morning
Muscle soreness
5
3
3
Heavy legs
6
4
3
Overall fatigue
5
3
3
Readiness
4
6
7
Sleep quality: 8/10 · Next morning: clearly better than normal
Would choose NANO Immersion again: Yes
Sep 16, 2026 · Recovery dayImmediately-after response not received
1 of 3 check-ins received Follow-up outstanding
Reported measure
Before
After
Morning
Muscle soreness
4
—
—
Heavy legs
5
—
—
Overall fatigue
4
—
—
Readiness
5
—
—
Next-morning check-in not received.
Example athlete: A006
Sep 11, 2026 · Post-matchNo change
3 of 3 check-ins received Complete
Reported measure
Before
After
Morning
Muscle soreness
4
4
4
Heavy legs
4
4
4
Overall fatigue
4
4
4
Readiness
6
6
6
Sleep quality: 7/10 · Next morning: about the same
